should drop out. I have to say (my two cents):
- it is offensive for one to assert that she MUST get out
- what's wrong with two or three or four or five more primary elections, and for voters in those states to have their say
- to the assertion that her remaining in will "destroy the party," I say "Bunk."
- What would destroy the party is the BEHAVIOR of the loser's supporters in this ongoing competition. Yes, Obama has won 10 or 11 in a row, and if I were Hillary (or she were me) I'd examine the question of "how much further," but to say that outsiders should have a view on whether she withdraws is obnoxious. THIS is how we pick our nominees, and it is not only a chance for voters to vote, it is practice for our eventual winner, and it keeps our message on the front page.
- The candidates' CONDUCT and the supporters' REACTIONs after the contest is decided will determine whether (as I suspect is NOT going to be the case) our party "tears itself apart."
- That's the sort of hyperbole that losers try to peddle. I'm even more offended when its outsiders or the other side (so far as I know, Obama has NOT in any way suggested that Hillary should get out; it is HER call).
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder