Re: [Dems2008] Re: Loving v. Virginia (1967)

I know I have not proposed a candidate needs to use the word marriage.
That is a losing proposition.

I think both Hillary and Barack are far more evolved than most
Democrats and either will do what is necessary to move us in the
direction of equality. The first step they both already agree on,
stated full equality with other terminology. Once that happens, the
obvious lack of damage will make it silly to keep retaining the word.

But first things first.
Elect Democrats.
Get a moderate or liberal supreme court.
Change public opinion.
Rule that separate must be equal. (Sound familiar?)

All part of progress.

I assume we are open to discuss issues that are Democratic and not just
about our great candidates.

--- raschueller <raschueller@yahoo.com> wrote:

> --- In Dems2008@yahoogroups.com, nancy m gibson <nmgibson@...> wrote:
> >
> > This is a ridiculous debate.
>
> Nancy the POINT of this discussion is that there are certain issues
> that no matter how dear, do not serve a candidate well to speak
> about.
> They are loosing issues.

= M =
owner of significant cat

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Dems2008/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Dems2008/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Dems2008-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Dems2008-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Dems2008-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/