6 Nisan 2008 Pazar

[Dems2008] Re: "The boys always wanted me to quit"

They haven't come out for it because no one who votes would vote for
them if they really told people the truth of what they really believe
in their hearts ... It's just like if you didn't believe in a god ...
we might be breaking gender and racial barriers because that's a new
taboo in our culture but we'll never ever see an Atheist for a
canidate or an anti-death penalty canidate or a Socialist
canidate ... We will never see it unless more Americans voted and not
just 50% of America. I guess we can be happy if they at least believe
in golbal warming and evolution (unlike you know who)

Brian

--- In Dems2008@yahoogroups.com, nancy m gibson <nmgibson@...> wrote:
>
> I wonder why neither Hillary or Obama comes out against the death
> penalty.
> We are the only nation in the Western World that still has a death
> penalty.
> It is something I feel strongly about.------------Nan
>
> NEVER COMPLAIN AND NEVER EXPLAIN: MOVE IMMEDIATELY
> TO ATTACK---------------from The Lion & The Unicorn
>
>
> The candidates on the legal justice system
> COMMENTARY | April 03, 2008
> Where McCain, Clinton, Obama stand on the death penalty, crack
cocaine
> sentencing, minimum sentencing and other issues.
> By Nonna Gorilovskaya
> nonna@...
> Some 2.3 million Americans—more than one in every hundred adults—
are in
> prison or in jail this election year. This unflattering record
hasn't
> prompted much debate between the presidential candidates on the
criminal
> justice system, or many questions from reporters, either. The
> Washington-based Sentencing Project, a nonprofit organization that
urges
> reform, charts out the positions of John McCain, Hillary Clinton and
> Barack Obama on issues such as the death penalty and mandatory
minimum
> sentences in a report issued in March. McCain is the most status
quo of
> the three, while Clinton and Obama have come out for and helped
pass some
> legislative reforms.
> All three candidates support the death penalty. Obama's views on the
> subject have shifted in a more conservative direction over the
years.
> "When Barack Obama first ran for the Illinois state Senate in 1996,
he
> said in a campaign questionnaire that he opposed capital punishment…
By
> the time Obama ran for the U.S. Senate in 2004, he was not
advocating
> abolition of the death penalty, but was saying the system of
> investigating and prosecuting crimes was so flawed that the nation
should
> declare a moratorium on executions," according to a San Francisco
> Chronicle article quoted in the report. That position has shifted,
so
> that today Obama supports the death penalty for the most heinous
crimes.
> As a state senator, Obama passed a landmark Illinois law that
required
> the videotaping of police interrogations and confessions in capital
> cases. The report notes Clinton's support as first lady for her
husband's
> 1994 crime bill that expanded the number of crimes covered by the
federal
> death penalty and her advocacy for DNA testing. McCain was against
the
> Racial Justice Act that would have allowed minority defendants
sentenced
> to death to use statistics showing a pattern of discrimination in
death
> penalty sentencing in their jurisdictions in their appeals.
Although the
> Act was passed by the House, Senate opposition meant that it never
made
> it into that same 1994 crime bill signed into law by President Bill
> Clinton.
> The Democrats' focus on the fair implementation of the death
penalty was
> indicative of their concern about the disproportionate
representation of
> minorities in the criminal justice system. Clinton and Obama want to
> eliminate the 100-1 disparity between powder and crack cocaine
penalties
> and are co-sponsors of a bill that would equalize them. This
constitutes
> a more liberal move for Clinton, who told the Boston Globe last
year that
> "as a matter of practical politics" equalization may not be yet
> achievable "but we…ought to be able to get 10-to-1 or something that
> would move us in the right direction." Obama supports the
retroactive
> application of such sentencing changes, but Clinton has stated that
she
> had "problems with retroactivity." McCain's views on the subject
are not
> given.
> Clinton and Obama prefer that nonviolent drug offenders be handled
by the
> drug courts that order defendants to undergo treatment in lieu of
jail
> time. In a 2007 town hall meeting, McCain also said that "we have
too
> many first time drug offenders in prison" and pointed to an Arizona
> rehabilitation program that had "very significant testing
procedures."
> Programs that give ex-offenders the job skills needed for a more
> successful reintegration into their communities have support across
party
> lines. Obama and Clinton are cosponsors of the 2007 Second Chance
Act
> that would provide for more substance abuse counseling and job
training
> to former offenders. The bill was passed in the Senate on March
11th by
> unanimous consent and is awaiting the President George Bush's
signature.
> Obama has also addressed the larger socio-economic problems that
fuel the
> drug trade. "For many inner-city men, what prevents gainful
employment is
> not simply the absence of motivation to get off the streets but the
> absence of a job history or any marketable skills—and,
increasingly, the
> stigma of a prison record. We can assume that with lawful work
available
> for young men now in the drug trade, crime in any community would
drop,"
> Obama writes in his second book, The Audacity of Hope.
> Federal mandatory minimum sentences garnered some attention this
year
> when the Clinton campaign attacked Obama for previously stating
that he
> would have voted against them. The report doesn't offer much
> clarification on the differences between Clinton's and Obama's or,
for
> that matter, McCain's positions. McCain is listed as supporting
mandatory
> minimum sentences for sellers of illegal drugs, Clinton as
supporting
> them for some violent crimes while Obama as once urging to abolish
them
> and promising to "review all minimum sentences and eliminate those
that
> are too harsh."
> The Sentencing Project cites a Washington Times article arguing that
> Obama has shifted on this as well as other issues. "In an October
2003
> NAACP debate, Mr. Obama said he would `vote to abolish' mandatory
minimum
> sentences. `The mandatory minimums take too much discretion away
from
> judges,' he said. Mr. Obama now says on his Web site,
> www.barackobama.com, that he would "immediately review sentences to
see
> where we can be smarter on crime and reduce the ineffective
warehousing
> of nonviolent drug offenders," the paper states. But an analysis of
the
> article by Media Matters for America, not cited in this report,
points
> out that on the same site the senator commits to abolishing
mandatory
> minimums for first-time possession of crack cocaine. Whether this
saves
> Obama from the flip-flopping charge is another matter. More
importantly
> for those trying to differentiate the candidates' positions, how all
> three would address penalties for crack cocaine possession—or any
other
> crime—is unclear from the report.
> Clinton and Obama favor extending the right to vote to former
felons who
> have served out their time but are still disenfranchised in some
states.
> This was one of the provisions of the 2005 Count Every Vote Act that
> Clinton wrote and Obama co-sponsored. The bill never came up for
debate
> in the Senate and is now dead. McCain's position on the issue is not
> given.
> The 12-page report begins with a table of the candidates' stances
and is
> followed by 10 pages of quotes, mostly from the candidates
themselves.
>
> Nonna Gorilovskaya is a researcher for the Nieman Watchdog Project.
> E-mail: nonna@...
>
>
> http://niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction
>

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Dems2008/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Dems2008/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Dems2008-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Dems2008-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Dems2008-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Hiç yorum yok: