[Dems2008] Re: Guns

That's kinda scary you'd be willing to kill someone who is obviously
mentally unbalanced with almost not thought about it, just acting on
instinct ... my club is bigger than yours mentality, we're all just
cave men (and women respectfully) So much for thousands of years of
evolution. ... What would be wrong if instead of revolvers we all
carried non lethal weapons then (if we wanted to) we could stun the
shooter and get him or her the proper mental help they need? How
would you feel if you (or someone around you since we all have guns)
did have a handgun and accidentally missed the shooter / crazy person
and killed an innocent bystander ... would you still feel good about
carrying handgun and letting everyone carry one? ...... We can see
with the number of car accidents that Americans are not even
responsible with their cars what makes you think we will be
responsible for killing machines? AND YES they are killing machines
just like a club or a sword. I understand the concept behind people
kill people but guns enable people to do it easier and faster. Thank
of it this way if no more guns or bullets we're even manufactured
then we would have almost no gun crime... people would not get access
to killing machines if manufacturers wouldn't produce any.

Sorry I go on and on, but I'm of the generation of Colimbine High and
other school shootings and I reject the idea that more guns could
have made those events any better.

Thank You
Brian

--- In Dems2008@yahoogroups.com, "Sandra Goodwin" <bridger82923@...>
wrote:
>
> ---We have a ton of gun control laws on the books right now.
> Enforcement is the key.
> We live in WY so you can probably guess, we have guns in our
house.
> Sometimes I think if we were ALL armed and trained in the use of
> firearms, there were be a lot less mass shootings. I know if
someone
> walked into a classroom and started shooting where I was sitting
with
> my revolver on my hip I'd end it quickly. In WY you can carry an
> unconcealed weapon just about anywhere. It can be quite the
> deterrent.
>
>
>
> In Dems2008@yahoogroups.com, "raschueller" <raschueller@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In Dems2008@yahoogroups.com, nancy m gibson <nmgibson@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Pretty safe answer--he is getting good at that.
> >
> > So is she:
> >
> > "There's got to be some way that we can balance the constitutional
> > rights of hunters and target shooters and collectors and
everybody
> who
> > wants to and really appreciates being a gun owner with the safety
of
> > people who are just out Christmas shopping.... I think we've got
to
> > take a look at what the laws are today, and make sure we are
> enforcing
> > them to the fullest extent of the law, using technology, making it
> > clear that we're going to try as hard as we can to keep guns away
> from
> > people who shouldn't have them."
> >
> > Guess that makes them both worthless.
> >
> > You realize we could do this all day.
> >
>

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Dems2008/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Dems2008/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Dems2008-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Dems2008-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Dems2008-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/