--- In Dems2008@yahoogroups.com, Rob Harrington <Eamon1916@...> wrote:
>
> The Clinton campaign has a clear record of saying one thing... then
when it doesn't go their way claim the opposite...
>
> After a year of saying how great Iowa caucuses were... they finish
third in the caucuses and are beaten in every other caucus except
two... they are not claiming they're undemocratic.
>
> After saying that Michigan and Florida don't matter, and even
Clinton Campaign senior adviser Harold Ickes voting to strip their
delegates... now that they need Michigan and Florida's votes so
they're saying that they HAVE to count.
>
> After first promoting the special districts in the Nevada
caucuses... They lost support of some of the major unions that used
the special districts... so they came out as claiming the special
districts were undemocratic...
>
> In 2004 no one complained that Kerry was annointed the winner
before NC and IN voted... but now that they need to win them we have
to let them vote or we'll be disenfranchising them...
>
> Slainte,
> Rob Harrington
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: isabelle_ms <no_reply@yahoogroups.com>
> To: Dems2008@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 12:19:21 PM
> Subject: [Dems2008] Re: Media finally confirms Obama won Texas
>
> Texas just proves that caucuses are not indicative of popular vote,
> so how do any of us really know how the other caucus states would
> have voted if they had a private primary vote. Do you think it's
> fair that deployed military cannot vote in caucuses? I never
> realized, as I imagine most people in states where caucuses aren't
> used, just how undemocratic they are. I know it doesn't matter at
> this point, but they should be done away with after this year. You
> would saying the same thing if Obama was in this position, the only
> difference is that the media would be backing him up. Obama will
get
> the nomination in large part because of caucuses, and then I guess
we
> won't know until November whether we put forth the strongest
> candidate or just another loser. Lanny Davis, yes I know he's a
> Hillary supporter, quoted a poll last night that said Obama is now
> tied with McCain in Massachusetts, and if we could lose there, we
can
> lose it all.
>
> --- In Dems2008@yahoogroups.com, Rob Harrington <Eamon1916@> wrote:
> >
> > Again... they only are complaining about caucuses AFTER they lose
> them... Find me one instance of a Clinton campaign staffer
> complaining that caucuses were undemocratic from BEFORE Iowa.
> >
> > Slainte,
> > Rob Harrington
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: nancy m gibson <nmgibson@>
> > To: Dems2008@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 11:45:19 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Dems2008] Media finally confirms Obama won Texas
> >
> >
> > How interesting considering Hillary won the popular vote just
> > proves how Democratic the so called Democratic party really is.
> > Nan
> >
> > NEVER COMPLAIN AND NEVER EXPLAIN: MOVE IMMEDIATELY
> > TO ATTACK---------------from The Lion & The Unicorn
> >
> > Media finally confirms Obama won Texas
> >
> >
> >
> > From Associated Press- Obama wins 99 delegates to Clinton's 94
total
> > of primary and caucuses.
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Dems2008/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Dems2008/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Dems2008-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Dems2008-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Dems2008-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder