RE: [Dems2008] Re: [Democrats Online] Obama and the Syrian

Hello.  I write to say "Hello"  and to say not that you don't  but to say it looks like all here have their favorite and all that is going to happen in further exchange of Hillary is or Obama is is what happened yesterday; people getting unnecessarily upset.  let us say we should concentrate as Democrats for november.  The Republicans are going to have a field day if we keep this bickering up.  We need to change administrations in November to Democrat.  We don't need President Hucklebee.
 
ed

---

To: Dems2008@yahoogroups.com
From: patrickgfrank@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:27:19 +0000
Subject: [Dems2008] Re: [Democrats Online] Obama and the Syrian

Contrary to your statement, Obama is well qualified to be president.
He is not to the Right of Hillary; he does emphasize working with all
Parties to achieve results, something needed desperately in our
fractured nation. He is highly intelligent, has wisdom, is
well-informed on all of the issues. And he has his ego under control.

Some will complain that Obama is too far to the Right. Some will
complain that he is too far to the Left. The truth is that he is
capable of taking the best liberal and conservative ideas and melding
them together. We need this kind of creative thinking.

Patrick from SC

--- In Dems2008@yahoogroups.com, "(Systems Operator)" <harry@...> wrote:
>
> Carol: Of course it was a typo. We all make them. As for one problem
with
> Obama, I wish it was only one. He is completely unqualified and has an
> ideology which puts him to the right of Hillary. He is the worst choice
> for democrats and I am certain the Republicans will have enough on
him to
> win again. And it gets worse. Read the investigation at the
Sun-Times and
> don't forget one of the best journalist/economicsts we have on the
> progressive side, Krugman. Read his analysis of the Obama plans for
health
> care and the economy. All of a sudden Krugman is not credible?
>
> Hank Roth
>
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Carol Roberts wrote:
>
> > How does one "confict" Obama. Did you mean convict? If Obama
only has
> > one deep pocket in his background that would be a relief compared to
> > what we're going to go through if Hillary is the nominee. We will not
> > only have to relive all the stuff and nonsense of the 90's, but we
will
> > find out in excruciating detail about how the Clinton's, who had no
> > money at the time he left the presidency, have, in the past 7 years
> > amassed a net worth of about 30 million dollars. We are going to hear
> > about every dime of it, and how it arrived in their various bank
> > accounts, count on it. So am I afraid of Obama's one guy, now in
jail,
> > who supported him a bit? NO....... bring it on.
> >
> > Carol
> >
> > (Systems Operator) wrote:
> >> You don't need DNA evidence to confict Obama.
> >
>

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___